A hybridized IT2FS-DEMATEL-AHP-TOPSIS multicriteria decision making approach: Case study of selection and evaluation of criteria for determination of air traffic control radar position

  • Ivan Petrovic University of defence in Belgrade, Military academy, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Milan Kankaras University of defence in Belgrade, Military academy, Belgrade, Serbia
Keywords: AHP; Air Traffic Control Radar Position; DEMATEL; Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets; TOPSIS

Abstract

In this paper the criteria for selection of air traffic control (ATC) radar position that provide successfully fulfilled role of radar in air traffic management are determined and evaluated. Using the questionnaire, experts determined the initial criteria for selecting the radar position. Furthermore, the hybridized DEMATEL-AHP-TOPSIS model was modified by using the interval type-2 fuzzy sets (IT2FS). Less important criteria were eliminated by using the IT2FS-DEMATEL method, the prioritization of the final criteria was carried out by using the IT2FS-AHP method and a multi-criteria decision making model was proposed. Of the four ATC radar positions offered, the optimal position was selected by using the IT2FS-TOPSIS method. Validation of model was carried out by using Fuzzy and the IT2FS modified methods: TOPSIS, COPRAS and MABAC. A sensitivity analysis was carried out through 36 scenarios of changes in the criteria’s weights.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baykasoğlu, A., & Gölcük, İ. (2017). Development of an interval type-2 fuzzy sets based hierarchical MADM model by combining DEMATEL and TOPSIS. Expert Systems with Applications, 70, 37-51.

Bergen, P., & Tiedemann, K. (2010). The Year of the Drone. New America Foundation. Retrieved May, 4, 2019 from http://chrisherwig.org/data-src/pdf/f2f94dd4-53b7-11e2-b73e-5c969d8d366f-the-year-of-the-drone-newamerica-net.pdf

Card, B. A. (2018). Terror from Above: How the Commercial Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Revolution Threatens the US Threshold. Air & Space Power Journal, 32(1), 80-96.

Carey, B. (2019). Summer heat: Europe scrambles to match ATC capacity to growing demand. AIR TRANSPORT WORLD. Penton Media, Incorporated.

Celik, E., & Akyuz, E. (2018). An interval type-2 fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methods for decision-making problems in maritime transportation engineering: the case of ship loader. Ocean Engineering, 155, 371-381.

Chen, Z. S., Yang, Y., Wang, X. J., Chin, K. S., & Tsui, K. L. (2019). Fostering Linguistic Decision-Making under Uncertainty: A Proportional Interval Type-2 Hesitant Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach Based on Hamacher Aggregation Operators and Andness Optimization Models. Information Sciences, 500, 229-258.

Deveci, M., Canıtez, F., & Gökaşar, I. (2018). WASPAS and TOPSIS based interval type-2 fuzzy MCDM method for a selection of a car sharing station. Sustainable Cities and Society, 41, 777-791.

Dinçer, H., Yüksel, S., & Martínez, L. (2019). Interval type 2-based hybrid fuzzy evaluation of financial services in E7 economies with DEMATEL-ANP and MOORA methods. Applied Soft Computing, 79, 186-202.

Fleischer, T., Meyer-Soylu, S., Schippl, J., & Decker, M. (2019). Personal aerial transportation systems (PATS)–A potential solution for the urban mobility challenges? Futures, 109, 50-62

Garg, H. (2019). Algorithms for possibility linguistic single-valued neutrosophic decision-making based on COPRAS and aggregation operators with new information measures. Measurement, 138, 278-290.

Ghorabaee, M.K., Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z. & Antucheviciene, J. (2016). A new combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) method for multi-criteria decision-making. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 50(3), 25-44.

Haghighi, M. H., Mousavi, S. M., & Mohagheghi, V. (2019). A new soft computing model based on linear assignment and linear programming technique for multidimensional analysis of preference with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Applied Soft Computing, 77, 780-796.

Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (2012). Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications a state-of-the-art survey (Vol. 186). Springer Science & Business Media.

Islam, M. S., Ahmed, M. M., & Islam, S. (2018). A conceptual system architecture for countering the civilian unmanned aerial vehicles threat to nuclear facilities. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 23, 139-149.

Kahraman, C., Öztayşi, B., Sarı, İ. U., & Turanoğlu, E. (2014). Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Knowledge-Based Systems, 59, 48-57.

Kaya, R., & Yet, B. (2019). Building Bayesian Networks based on DEMATEL for Multiple Criteria Decision Problems: A Supplier Selection Case Study. Expert Systems with Applications. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.05.053

Liang, D., Wang, M., & Xu, Z. (2019). Heterogeneous multi-attribute nonadditivity fusion for behavioral three-way decisions in interval type-2 fuzzy environment. Information Sciences, 496, 242-263.

Milošević, M. R., Milošević, D. M., Stević, D. M., & Stanojević, A. D. (2019). Smart City: Modeling Key Indicators in Serbia Using IT2FS. Sustainability, 11(13), 3536.

Moghaddam, N. B., Sahafzadeh, M., Alavijeh, A. S., Yousefdehi, H., & Hosseini, S. H. (2010). Strategic environment analysis using DEMATEL method through systematic approach: Case study of an energy research institute in Iran. Management Science and Engineering, 4(4), 95-105.

Pamučar, D., Petrović, I., & Ćirović, G. (2018). Modification of the Best–Worst and MABAC methods: A novel approach based on interval-valued fuzzy-rough numbers. Expert systems with applications, 91, 89-106.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.08.042

Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2018). Integration of interval rough AHP and interval rough MABAC methods for evaluating university web pages. Applied Soft Computing, 67, 141-163. doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.02.057

Petrović, I., & Kankaraš, M. (2018). DEMATEL-AHP multi-criteria decision making model for the selection and evaluation of criteria for selecting an aircraft for the protection of air traffic. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 1(2), 93-110. doi.org/10.31181/dmame1802091p

Petrović, I., Kankaraš, M., & Cvetković, K. (2015). Significance and prospects of the development of air defence system. Vojno delo, 67(6), 86-98. doi:org/10.5937/vojdelo1506086P

Singh, A., & Prasher, A. (2019). Measuring healthcare service quality from patients’ perspective: using Fuzzy AHP application. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 30(3-4), 284-300. doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2017.1302794

Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D., Vasiljević, M., Stojić, G., & Korica, S. (2017). Novel integrated multi-criteria model for supplier selection: Case Study Construction Company. Symmetry, 9(11), 279. doi:org/10.3390/sym9110279

Sumrit, D., & Anuntavoranich, P. (2013). Using DEMATEL method to analyze the causal relations on technological innovation capability evaluation factors in Thai technology-based firms. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies, 4(2), 81-103.

Wang, Z., Xu, G., Wang, H., & Ren, J. (2019). Distributed energy system for sustainability transition: A comprehensive assessment under uncertainties based on interval multi-criteria decision making method by coupling interval DEMATEL and interval VIKOR. Energy, 169, 750-761.doi:org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.105

Zhang, Z. (2018). Trapezoidal interval type-2 fuzzy aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making. Neural Computing and Applications, 29(4), 1039-1054.

Zhao, S., & Yue, Y. B. (2014). Research on the conformal phased-array antenna. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 685, 324-327.

Published
2020-03-14
How to Cite
Petrovic, I., & Kankaras, M. (2020). A hybridized IT2FS-DEMATEL-AHP-TOPSIS multicriteria decision making approach: Case study of selection and evaluation of criteria for determination of air traffic control radar position. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 3(1), 146-164. Retrieved from https://dmame.rabek.org/index.php/dmame/article/view/58