Hybridizations of Archimedean copula and generalized MSM operators and their applications in interactive decision-making with q-rung probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy environment
Abstract
The q-rung probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy sets (qRPDHFSs), which outperform dual hesitant fuzzy sets, probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy sets, and probabilistic dual hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy sets, are used in this research to develop an interactive group decision-making approach. We first suggest the Archimedean Copula-based operations on q-rung probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy (qRPDHF) components and investigate their key features before constructing the approach. We then create some new aggregation operators (AOs) in light of these operations, including the qRPDHF generalized Maclaurin symmetric mean (MSM) operator, qRPDHF geometric generalized MSM operator, qRPDHF weighted generalized MSM operator, and qRPDHF weighted generalized geometric generalized MSM operator. These aggregation operators are better than current operators on qRPDHF because they can take into account the interactions between a large number of criteria and probability distributions. The evaluation findings are distorted since the present methodologies do not take expert involvement into account in order to achieve the required consistency level. We employ the idea of interaction, consistency, resemblance, and consensus-building among the decision-makers in our method to get around this. We create an optimization model based on the cross-entropy of the qRPDHF components to estimate the weights of the criterion. We provide contextual research on the choice of open-source software LMS in order to demonstrate the relevance of the recommended AOs. Likewise, we ran a sensitivity test on the weights of the criterion to make sure that our model is consistent. The comparison investigation has demonstrated that the suggested approach can overcome the challenges of previous works.
Downloads
References
Bacigal, T., Mesiar, R., & Najjari, V. (2015). Generators of Copulas and aggregation. Information Sciences, 306, 81-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2015.01.032
Bashiri, M., & Badri, H. (2011). A group decision making procedure for fuzzy interactive linear assignment programming. Expert Systems with Application, 38 (5), 5561–5568. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.10.080
Beliakov, G., Pradera, A., & Calvo, T. (2007). Aggregation functions: a guide for practitioners, In Kacprzyk, editors. Studies in fuzziness and soft computing. Berlin: Springer.
Bonferroni, C. (1950). Sulle medie multiple di potenze. Bolletino dell Unione Matematica Italiana, 5 (3), 267-270.
Cheng, X., Gu, J., & Xu, Z.S. (2018). Venture capital group decision-making with interaction under probabilistic linguistic environment. Knowledge Based Systems, 140, 82-91.
Cheng, X., Gu, J., & Xu, Z.S. (2018). Venture capital group decision-making with interaction under probabilistic linguistic environment. Knowledge-Based Systems, 140, 82-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2017.10.030
Garg, H., & Kaur, G. (2018). A robust correlation coefficient for probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy sets and its applications. Neural Computing and Applications, 32, pages 8847–8866 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04362-y.
Garg, H., & Kaur, G. (2018). Algorithm for probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision making based on aggregation operators with new distance measures. Mathematics, 6(12), 280 https://doi. org/10. 3390/math6120280.
Ghorabaee, M.K., Zavadskas, E. K., Amiri, M., & Esmaeili, A. (2016). Multi-criteria evaluation of green suppliers using an extended WASPAS method with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 213-229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.031
Gou, X.J., Liao, H.C., Xu, Z.S., Min, R., & Herrera, F. (2019). Group decision making with double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations: Consistency based measures, index and repairing algorithms and decision model. Information Sciences, 489, 93-112.
Grabisch, M., Maricha, J. L., Mesiar, R. & Pap, E. (2011). Aggregation functions: Construction methods, conjunctive, disjunctive and mixed classes. Information Sciences, 181, 23-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2010.08.040
Han, B., Tao, Z., Chen, H., Zhou, L., & Liu, J. (2020). A new computational model based on Archimedean copula for probabilistic unbalanced linguistic term set and its application to multi-attribute group decision-making. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 140, 106264 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106264.
Han, X. L., & Li, S.R. (1994). The priority method in view of consistency harmonious weight index. System Engineering, Theory and Methodology, 3(1), 41-45.
Hao, Z., Xu , Z., Zhao, H., & Su, Z (2017). Probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy set and its application in risk evaluation. Knowledge Based Systems, 127, 16–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2017.02.033
Hara, T., Uchiyama, M., & Takahasi, S.E. (1998). A refinement of various mean inequalities. Journal of In-equalities and Applications, 2(4), 387-395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/S1025583498000253
Hezam, I.M., Mishra, A. R., Rani, P., Saha, A., Pamucar, D., & Smarandache, F. (2023). An integrated decision support framework using single-valued neutrosophic- MASWIP-COPRAS for sustainability assessment of bio-energy production technologies. Expert System with Applications, 211, 118674 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118674.
Ji, C., Zhang, R., & Wang, j. (2021). Probabilistic dual‑hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy sets and their application in multi-attribute group decision-making. Cognitive Computation, 13, 919–935.
Krishankumar, R., Sivagami, R., Saha, A., P. Rani, Ravichandran, K. S., & Arun, K. (2022). Cloud vendor selection for the health-care industry using a big data driven decision model with probabilistic linguistic information. Applied Intelligence, 52, 13497–13519 http://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-021-02913-2.
Li, L., Lei, H., & Wang, J. (2020). q-Rung probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy sets and their application in multi-attribute decision-making. Mathematics, 8, 1574 https://doi.org/10.3390/math8091574.
Liao, H., & Xu, X. (2019). DNMA: A double normalization-based multiple-aggregation method for multi-expert multi-criteria decision-making. Omega, 93 (3), 102058.
Maclaurin, C. (1729). A second letter to Martin Folkes, Esq concerning the roots of equations, with demonstration of other rules of algebra. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London, Ser A 36, 59-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstl.1729.0011
Mishra, A. R., Rani, P., Pamucar, D., Hezam, I.M., & Saha, A. (2022b). Entropy and discrimination measures based q-rung orthopair fuzzy MULTIMOORA framework for selecting solid waste disposal method. Environmental Science and Pollution Research https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-022-22734-1.
Mishra, A. R., Rani, P., Saha, A., Hezam, I.M., & Pamucar, D. (2022c). Fermatean fuzzy copula aggregation operators and similarity measures-based complex proportional assessment approach for renewable energy source selection. Complex and Intelligent Systems, 8, 5223–5248 http://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-022-00743-4.
Mishra, A. R., Saha, A., Rani, P., Hezam, I.M., Shrivastava, R., & Smarandache, F. (2022d). An integrated decision support framework using single-valued MEREC-MULTIMOORA for low carbon tourism strategy assessment. IEEE Access, 10, 24411-24432.
Mishra, A. R., Saha, A., Rani, P., Pamucar, D., Dutta, D., & Hezam, I.M. (2022a). Sustainable supplier selection using HF-DEA-FOCUM-MABAC technique: A case study in the auto making industry. Soft Computing, 26, 8821–8840 link: http://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-07192-8.
Nather, W. (2010). Copulas and t-norms: Mathematical tools for combining probabilistic and fuzzy information with application to error propagation and interaction. Structural Safety, 32, 366-371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2010.02.001
Nelsen, R.B. (2013). An introduction to Copula, Springer Science and Business Media.
Rani, P., Mishra, A. R., Saha, A. (2021). Fermatean fuzzy Heronian mean operators and MEREC based additive ratio assessment method for food waste treatment technology selection. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 37 (3), 2612-2647.
Ren, Z., Xu, Z., & Wang, H. (2017). An extended TODIM method under probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy information and its applicationon enterprise strategic assessment. In: 2017 IEEE international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management (IEEM). 1464–1468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2017.8290136
Ren, Z., Xu, Z., & Wang, H. (2019). The strategy selection problem on artificial intelligence with an integrated VIKOR and AHP method under probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy information. IEEE Access, 7, 103979– 103999.
Reverberi, P., & Talamo, M. (1999). A probabilistic model for interactive decision-making. Decision Support Systems, 25 (4), 289–308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(99)00013-5
Saha, A., , & Yager, R. R. (2021a). Hybridizations of generalized Dombi operators and Bonferroni mean operators under dual probabilistic linguistic environment for group decision-making. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 36(11), 6645-6679,
Saha, A., Dutta, D., Kar, S. (2021b). Some new hybrid hesitant fuzzy weighted aggregation operators based on Archimedean and Dombi operations for multi-attribute decision making. Neural Computing and Applications, 33 (14), 8753-8776.
Saha, A., Ecer, F., Chatterjee, P., Senapati, T., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2022b). q-Rung orthopair fuzzy improved power weighted operators for solving group decision-making issues. INFORMATICA, 33(3), 593–621 https://www.informatica.vu.lt/journal/INFORMATICA/article/1271/read.
Saha, A., Garg, H., & Dutta, D. (2021c). Generalized Dombi and Bonferroni mean operators based group decision-making under probabilistic linguistic q-rung orthopair fuzzy environment. International Journal of Intelligent System, 36 (12), 7770-7804.
Saha, A., Pamucar, D., Gorcun, O. F., & Mishra, A. R. (2023). Warehouse site selection for the automotive industry using a Fermatean fuzzy based decision-making approach. Expert System With Applications, 211, 118497 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118497.
Saha, A., Simic, V., Senapati, T., Dabic-Miletic, S., & Ala, A. (2022a). A dual hesitant fuzzy sets-based methodology for advantage prioritization of zero-emission last-mile delivery solutions for sustainable city logistics. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems (doi:10.1109/TFUZZ.2022.3164053).
Sakawa, M., & Yano, H. (1986). Interactive fuzzy decision making for multi-objective nonlinear programming using augmented minimax problems. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20(1), 31–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80029-X
Senapati, T. (2022). Approaches to multi-attribute decision making based on picture fuzzy Aczel-Alsina average aggregation operators. Computational & Applied Mathematics, 41(40), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-021-01742-w.
Senapati, T., Chen, G., Mesiar, R., Yager, R.R., & Saha, A. (2022). Novel Aczel-Alsina operations-based hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications in cyclone disaster assessment. International Journal of General Systems, 51(5), 511-546.
Shi, X., & Xia, H. (1997). Interactive bi-level multi-objective decision making. Operations Research, 48 (9), 943-949. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jors.2600435
Sklar, M. (1959). Fonctions de repartition a n dimensions et leurs marges. Universite Paris, 8, 229-231.
Tao, Z., Han, B., & Chen, H. (2018). On Intuitionistic fuzzy Copula aggregation operators in multiple-attribute decision-making. Cognitive Computation, 10, 610–624 http: //doi.org/10.1007/s12559-018-9545-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-018-9545-1
Torra, V. (2010). Hesitant fuzzy sets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 25(6), 529–539. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/int.20418
Wang, J.Q., Yang, Y., & Li, L. (2018). Multi criteria decision-making method based on single valued neutrosophic linguistic Maclaurin symmetric mean operators. Neural Computing and Applications, 30 (5), 1529-1547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2747-0
Watson, W.E., Michaelsen, L.K., & Sharp, W. (1991). Member competence, group interaction, and group decision making: a longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76 (6), 803–809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.803
Xu, Z., & Zhou, W. (2017). Consensus building with a group of decision makers under the hesitant probabilistic fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 16(4), 481–503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-016-9257-5
Xu, Z.S., & Chen, J. (2007). An interactive method for fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making. Information Science, 177 (1), 248–263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2006.03.001
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338–353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
Zhu, B., Xu, Z., Xia, M. (2012). Dual hesitant fuzzy sets. Journal of Applied Mathematics, Volume 2012, Article ID 879629 https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/879629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/879629
